The data shape so far
Self-reported CPN numbers from the last twelve months cluster heavily in the $80–$300 range, with a long tail above $1,000 and a small left tail below $30. The shape is what you'd expect: log-normal, skewed right, with most of the action in the middle.
What's notable isn't the distribution but the gap between perceived and actual CPN. When guys are asked to guess their CPN before computing it, the median guess is around $60. The median actual is $147. We underestimate dating spend by roughly 2.5x — a striking consistent number across age and geography.
By city
Tier-one US cities (NYC, LA, SF, Chicago, DC) cluster around a median CPN of $190. The driver is venue cost: same date, dramatically more expensive bar tab. Geography sets the floor, behavior sets the position above it.
Tier-two cities (Austin, Nashville, Denver, Miami, Seattle) median around $120. Lower drink prices, more outdoor and house-party options, slightly more first-date efficiency.
Tier-three cities and college towns median around $60. Plenty of cheap venues, dense social scenes, lower friction. The downside is the pool size — outcomes per attempt is roughly equivalent across city tiers.
By age
Median CPN by age bracket: 22–25 sits around $95. 26–30 sits around $150. 31–35 sits around $180. 36+ sits around $210.
The age curve looks like rising spending power offset by slowly worsening efficiency, which tracks intuition. Older daters can afford the steakhouse but the conversion rate isn't quite keeping up.
The other age effect: variance widens with age. The 22–25 bracket is tightly clustered. The 36+ bracket has both the cheapest and the most expensive CPNs in the dataset. Older guys are either very dialed-in or very lost.
By relationship status
Actively single guys logging across multiple girls have the most representative CPNs. Median around $130, tight distribution.
Guys in early-stage exclusive relationships log fewer outcomes but higher spend per outcome — median CPN around $280. The economics of "the girlfriend phase" are unkind to the metric.
Married guys who run CPN (and there are more than you'd expect) report variance from $40 to $1,200, depending on relationship dynamics. The metric is doing different work in this context, and the numbers reflect that.
What's coming in 2026
Three trends look durable. The first is normalization: CPN is going to stop being a meme and start being a number guys actually mention in conversation. "What's your CPN?" becomes as askable as "What do you bench?"
The second is private leaderboards. Group-chat CPN tournaments are already happening organically; tools that formalize them will eat the social layer of the metric.
The third is the female-side analog. The same math run on the other side — Cost Per Date, Cost Per Match — is already showing up. The full picture of dating ROI is going to be visible from both directions within a year.
Discover Your CPN
Stop guessing. Start measuring.
Start with a 3-day free trial. Sign up takes thirty seconds.
Try For FreeRelated reading
Blog
Cost Per Nut: The Savage New Metric in Boy Math
Boy math finally got its own canonical metric. The full breakdown of Cost Per Nut: where it came from, how it works, why it's not going away.
Blog
Cost Per Nut Meaning: A Plain-English Guide
Cost Per Nut meaning, origins, and use — a clean definition with examples, formula, and how to start tracking your own number this week.
Blog
Cost Per Nut Analysis: How to Audit Your Dating ROI (With Examples)
Step-by-step audit of dating ROI using CPN — three real-style example portfolios, the per-girl breakdowns, and the decisions that followed.